| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-09-29 14:14:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20030929111407.B632@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > Master Slave
> > > ------ -----
> > > commit ready-->
> > > <--OK
> > > commit done->XX
> > >
> > > is the "commit done" message needed ?
> >
> > Of course ... how else will the Slave commit? From my understanding, the
> > concept is that the master sends a commit ready to the slave, but the OK
> > back is that "OK, I'm ready to commit whenever you are", at which point
> > the master does its commit and tells the slave to do its ...
>
> Or the slave could reject the request.
Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-29 14:23:23 | Re: more i18n/l10n issues |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-29 14:13:18 | Re: 2-phase commit |