From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
Date: | 2003-09-29 03:56:00 |
Message-ID: | 20030929005440.Y632@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
>
> [At participant(master)'s side]
> Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
>
> [At coordinator(slave)' side]
> 1) After a while
> 2) re-establish the communication path between the
> partcipant(master)'s TM.
> 3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
> 1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
> the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
>
> If there's no objection from you, I would assume I'm right.
'K, but what happens if the slave never gets a 'commit ok'? Does the
slave keep trying ad nausem?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-29 04:02:48 | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-09-29 03:48:48 | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |