Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)
Date: 2003-09-28 16:38:03
Message-ID: 200309281638.h8SGc3T09851@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 10:42:02PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't Perl pretty ubiquitous on "Unix" now, though? Except maybe
> > > Unixware....
> >
> > I know that Solaris now has it included by default ...
>
> FWIW, FreeBSD just removed it (in the 5.x versions). Of course you can
> still easily install it from ports.

Interesting. Why would they remove it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-28 16:48:55 Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-28 16:13:22 Re: Tuning/performance question.