From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
Date: | 2003-09-28 00:38:05 |
Message-ID: | 200309280038.h8S0c5b27837@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> It's been brought to my attention that there is no mechanism in place to
> allow people to recognise the best or 'official' PostgreSQL interfaces,
> and I don't just mean those in the core distribution, but those that we
> consider the best of their type such a psqlODBC, libpqxx, Npgsql and so
> on.
>
> Obviously we can list them on a webpage, but what criteria could we use
> to select them?
I talked to the JDBC guys about this already. What we need is a section
in the documentation about the various interfaces that are not
distributed with PostgreSQL, where to find them, and how they differ,
e.g. how are the perl interfaces and c++ interfaces different.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-28 23:39:25 | Re: p3p Policy problems |
Previous Message | World Wide Web Owner | 2003-09-27 19:24:17 | New News Entry |