Re: 'Official' Interfaces

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'Official' Interfaces
Date: 2003-09-28 00:38:05
Message-ID: 200309280038.h8S0c5b27837@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> It's been brought to my attention that there is no mechanism in place to
> allow people to recognise the best or 'official' PostgreSQL interfaces,
> and I don't just mean those in the core distribution, but those that we
> consider the best of their type such a psqlODBC, libpqxx, Npgsql and so
> on.
>
> Obviously we can list them on a webpage, but what criteria could we use
> to select them?

I talked to the JDBC guys about this already. What we need is a section
in the documentation about the various interfaces that are not
distributed with PostgreSQL, where to find them, and how they differ,
e.g. how are the perl interfaces and c++ interfaces different.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-28 23:39:25 Re: p3p Policy problems
Previous Message World Wide Web Owner 2003-09-27 19:24:17 New News Entry