Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-26 22:19:36
Message-ID: 200309262219.h8QMJax10965@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > The argument that you want a warning because you might have mixed
> > newlines in the file seems less likely than this case where they are
> > using a literal carriage return as a data value at the end of the line.
>
> I don't agree with that assessment. Who actually has CRs in their data?

Uh, people storing Win32 text documents.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 22:24:35 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 22:18:55 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 22:24:35 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 22:18:55 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 22:24:35 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 22:18:55 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)