| From: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-09-26 17:56:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20030926185635.D13717@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:49:30PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
...
> if we are talking two computers sitting next to each other on a switch,
> you'd expect those to be low ... but if you were talking about two
> seperate geographical locations (and yes, I realize you are adding lag to
> the mix with waiting for responses), you'd expect those #s to rise ...
Which I thought was the whole point of using a group communication protocol
such as spread in postgresql-r. It seemed solved there...
Cheers,
Patrick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 17:58:07 | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 17:52:18 | Re: pg_dump/all doesn't output schemas correctly (v7.3.4) |