Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-26 18:46:22
Message-ID: 200309261846.h8QIkMv24816@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ... we could add code to throw the WARNING
> > only once per COPY command --- that would probably make sense.
>
> Seems like a bit of a kluge, but perhaps the best compromise. It would
> be quite likely that you'd get the same warning on many lines of a COPY,
> and that probably isn't really going to help people.

I can't think of any cases where we throw _tons_ of warnings at people,
like we could with COPY.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 19:01:22 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Dr NoName 2003-09-26 18:45:42 transaction timeout

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-09-26 18:52:42 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 18:40:30 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 19:01:22 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 18:40:30 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)