From: | Wade Klaver <archeron(at)wavefire(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. |
Date: | 2003-09-25 19:30:49 |
Message-ID: | 200309251230.49386.archeron@wavefire.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Naturally, as I found this problem in a production database running 7.3.4, a
back-patch to 7.3 would be desireable. Even if just a patch was available
and was not commited to -STABLE, this would do. I would also then be able to
test such a critter on our development server for a future back-port if that
ever comes to pass.
-Wade
> I've committed the attached patch into CVS HEAD. I am now wondering
> whether to back-patch it to the 7.3 branch or not. It's a bit larger
> than I would have liked, and really needs more testing before being
> shoved into a stable branch.
>
> AFAICT you need a minimum of two levels of triggers invoked by an RI
> trigger to make this happen, so it may be a corner case best left
> unfixed in the 7.3 branch.
>
> Opinions anyone?
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Wade Klaver
Wavefire Technologies Corporation
GPG Public Key at http://archeron.wavefire.com
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
X - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-25 19:41:49 | pgsql-server/src/backend/executor execScan.c |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-09-25 19:29:54 | Re: pgsql procedures?? |