| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rory Campbell-Lange <rory(at)campbell-lange(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to find LIMIT in SQL standard |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 14:48:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20030925074435.Q79424@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Stephan. Sorry about the late reply.
>
> Your dissection of the standard (and thanks for the translation, by
> the way!) is a clear reason to use unique row ids. Unfortunately the
> project I am reporting bugs on does not do this at present.
Well, if you're looking for a PostgreSQL only solution (to throw in the
switch), I think someone already sent a query using oid and a subselect.
It's not going to perform super well probably and will only work on
tables with oids, but it should only update one row.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ericson Smith | 2003-09-25 14:49:43 | Triggers and COPY |
| Previous Message | Ramkrishna Chakrabarty | 2003-09-25 14:44:19 | MPI interface |