From: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2003-09-24 21:31:47 |
Message-ID: | 200309242131.h8OLVo129942@mail.osdl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 Sep, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> markw(at)osdl(dot)org writes:
>
>> http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/
>
> Are those response times in the right unit? 7-10s?
Yeah, the database really isn't tuned at all. I've gotten some
suggestions off the list that I will be trying. I'll report them as I
complete them.
> Are these mostly full table scans and big batch updates?
The plans (http://developer.osdl.org/markw/74/db/plan0.out) don't show
any table scans. They appears to be mostly index scans. There aren't
any batch updates.
> Personally, I'm more interested in seeing OLTP-oriented benchmarks testing
> quick index based transactions in the 20-200ms range, not big i/o-bound batch
> transactions. There's certainly a need for both, but I think the former are
> much more important to micro-optimize, at least for my needs.
Right, and when this thing is tuned better, I expect the transactions to
be down in the 20-200ms range. I do have about 70 drives for the
database, so it really shouldn't be i/o bound at with the size of the
database I'm using now, which is about 20 or 30 GB.
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-24 21:51:25 | Re: creating/accessing new runtime parameters |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-24 21:30:12 | Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. |