From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OT: HEADS-UP: viral storm out there |
Date: | 2003-09-23 17:28:04 |
Message-ID: | 20030923172804.GO9893@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
(I trimmed some of the cc:s)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:42:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> > In keeping with being off topic, how do people feel about Verisign
> > wild-carding the .com and .net domain names so any miskeys
> voting with your feet: if you still have any domains registered via
> Network Solutions, reregister them elsewhere, immediately.
Note that, while NSI is indeed a VeriSign company, VGRS (VeriSign
Global Registry Services, the registry people) are the ones doing
this, _not_ Network Solutions. That is, the action is at the
registry, not the registrar.
NSI competes to register names as a registrar. VGRS has no
competition in running .com or .net registries, however, except
insofar as people register domains in other top-level domains.
I'm not in the marketing department here, though, so I'll not suggest
other top level domains you might want to use. For the record, I am
not expressing any view on whether the wildcard idea is a good one,
although I certainly have an opinion on the matter.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-23 17:28:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Can't Build 7.3.4 on OS X |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-09-23 16:54:47 | Re: About GPL and proprietary software |