Re: transaction locking

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: tom baker <postgres(at)atoka-software(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transaction locking
Date: 2003-09-18 18:24:26
Message-ID: 20030918112013.O69397@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, tom baker wrote:

> ah, yes, i DID not see the NOT. that is fixed. here is the code that is having
> problems (paired down; all error checking has been removed!)
>
> $res=pg_query( "BEGIN TRANSACTION" ) ;
>
> $sql = "LOCK TABLE parts IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE" ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
>
> $sql = "SET CONSTRAINTS ALL DEFERRED" ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
>
> if ( $amc_part_no == "" )
> {
> $sql = "SELECT max(amc_part_no) FROM parts WHERE amc_part_no like 'G%'" ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
> $amc_part_no = pg_fetch_result( $res , 0 , 0 ) ;
> # and generate the next part number...
> }
>
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
>
> $sql = "INSERT INTO parts VALUES ( '".$make."', '".$amc_part_no."',
> '".$group_no."', '".$subgroup_no."', '".$part_name."', '".$description."',
> '".$prim_grp."', '".$prim_sbg."', '".$no_req."', '".$weight."',
> '".$graphic."' )" ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
>
> if ( ( $alt_group > "" ) )
> {
> $sql = "INSERT INTO part_group ( make, amc_part_no, group_no ) VALUES (
> '$make' , '$amc_part_no' , '$alt_group' ) " ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;
> }
>
> $sql = "INSERT INTO application VALUES ( '$make','$amc_part_no','$tyears',
> '$Amodel' )" ;
> $res = pg_query( $sql ) ;

Can you print out the queries you think you're sending and turn on query
logging and see what the database things? Inserting only the first three
columns into parts and then a matching application row doesn't seem to
fail for me in 7.3.4 or 7.4 beta 1.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Milne 2003-09-18 18:42:07 Unique Constraint Based on Date Range
Previous Message tom baker 2003-09-18 18:11:41 Re: transaction locking