Re: Updates with NULL

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updates with NULL
Date: 2003-09-15 15:15:35
Message-ID: 20030915081226.M66255@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

> I was just updating a table in oracle9.2 by hand and bumped into this.
>
> Following seems to be the valid syntax in oracle.
>
> Update foo set somefield=NULL where somefield >9;
>
> Now I am not sure having something equalled with NULL is a good thig logically.
> I would say
>
> Update foo set somefield [to] NULL where somefield >9;
>
> sounds much better. Postgresql uses =default expression which is fine.
>
> Is Oracle behaviour correct?

Yes (and we also allow update foo set somefield=NULL).

<set clause list> ::=
<set clause> [ { <comma> <set clause> }... ]

<set clause> ::=
<object column> <equals operator> <update source>

<update source> ::=
<value expression>
| <null specification>
| DEFAULT

<object column> ::= <column name>

and null specification is:

<null specification> ::=
NULL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message N.K. 2003-09-15 15:15:42 Re: Connecting to postgres from a romote machhine
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-15 15:14:56 Re: Initalizing PostgreSQL Database