| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
| Date: | 2003-09-12 13:47:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200309121347.h8CDlVL10379@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Note that there is no particular need to insist on any nearby newlines.
> If the construct is written just following an identifier or keyword,
> then you do need some intervening whitespace to keep the $Q$ from being
> read as part of that identifier, but I doubt this will bother anyone.
>
> Note that I'm allowing only letters, not digits, in the string; this
> avoids any possible ambiguity with $n parameter tokens. We have no
> other SQL tokens that are allowed to start with $, so this creates no
> other lexical ambiguity.
Sounds interesting. So it is $$text$$ or $quote$text$quote$?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-12 13:49:31 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-12 13:45:29 | Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum) |