Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

Are all the IPv6 issues resolved in current CVS?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > OK, now we are getting somewhere. I see that this would work. It's a bit
> > ugly, though - with this plan the sample file in both CVS and the
> > installation won't necessarily be what actually get put in place.
>
> Well, like I said, it's not real pretty. But the same is already true
> of postgresql.conf.sample --- initdb edits that. I don't see that
> having it edit pg_hba.conf.sample too is so bad.
>
> > What if some clever installer/administrator deliberately alters their
> > installed sample file?
>
> I don't think it would hurt them. The editing will consist of a sed
> script to comment or uncomment the line containg ::1, it wouldn't touch
> anything else.
>
> > Could we get the configure script to do it instead, since it too should
> > know about ip6 capability? (I guess then we'd have
> > pg_hba.conf.sample.in). That strikes me as being a lot cleaner.
>
> Bruce and I talked about that alternative too, but we felt that it made
> more sense to keep the processing of pg_hba.conf.sample parallel to what
> happens to postgresql.conf.sample. Further down the road we might need
> initdb-time checks to decide what to do to the sample file, just as we
> already need for postgresql.conf.sample.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073