| From: | Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c |
| Date: | 2003-09-09 15:14:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030909151457.GA657@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:53:06PM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > The particular assertion that was proposed doesn't strike me as terribly
> > useful - It should be checked at the point of call rather than inside
> > pstrdup, I should have thought.
>
> Are you going to trust the client of that function ?
Yes, because it can only used in backend code and C functions, which
can be written only by a trusted user ('cause C is an untrusted language).
(I might be wrong...)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Hall | 2003-09-09 15:27:24 | Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean |
| Previous Message | luke | 2003-09-09 15:08:12 | libpq++ |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-09 15:33:03 | Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-09-09 14:53:06 | Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c |