On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 19:13:47 +0530,
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2003 at 8:42, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> If that was hash index, Tom suggested to bump version number of the indexes in
> later versions and throw an error and ask user to reindex that particular
> index. This was good enogh solution to avoid initdb IIRC.
That was the one I was thinking of.