From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Vasilis Ventirozos <vendi(at)cosmoline(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ? |
Date: | 2003-09-08 13:15:50 |
Message-ID: | 20030908131550.GC14906@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:32:51 +0300,
Vasilis Ventirozos <vendi(at)cosmoline(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all, i work in a telco and i have huge ammount of data, (50 million)
> but i see a lack of performance at huge tables with postgres,
> are 50 million rows the "limit" of postgres ? (with a good performance)
> i am waiting for 2004 2 billion records so i have to do something.
> Does anyone have a huge database to ask him some issues ?
>
> my hardware is good ,my indexes are good plz dont answer me something like use
> vacuum :)
Well if you want specific answers, you need to give us some specific data.
For example, explain anaylze output for the slow queries and relevant
table definitions.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-09-08 13:21:08 | Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-09-08 13:13:19 | Re: Performance Issues |