| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_id and pg_encoding |
| Date: | 2003-09-07 15:46:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200309071546.h87FkKD06283@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Is there any reason to keep separate pg_id and pg_encoding programs, or
> should they be merged into a C version of initdb? AFAICS initdb is the
> only thing that uses them.
Yes, I assume they would go away with a C version.
> We'll also need to decide the Windows equivalent of the 'don't run as
> root' rule - or even if we want to enforce it at all, given that it
> appears to be very common practice on Windows to run all services as a
> user with Administrator privileges.
I assume we will relax that for Win32. I don't think non-Administrators
have the same isolation on Win32 as non-root users have on Unix.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-07 15:57:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-07 15:43:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |