Examining the output of: ldd `which postgres`

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Examining the output of: ldd `which postgres`
Date: 2003-09-05 21:53:57
Message-ID: 20030905215357.GE28462@perrin.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

% ldd `which postgres`
/usr/local/bin/postgres:
libintl.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.5 (0x282e6000)
libz.so.2 => /lib/libz.so.2 (0x282ef000)
libreadline.so.4 => /lib/libreadline.so.4 (0x282fd000)
libcrypt.so.2 => /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28325000)
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 (0x2833e000)
libutil.so.3 => /lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28357000)
libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x28363000)
libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x2843d000)
libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x2852c000)

Is it really necessary for postgres to be linked with ncurses (288K)
and readline (156K)? It's .5M, not the end of the world, but it seems
excessive. I know the postmaster has a CLI interface, but does it
really require ncurses or readline? -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-05 21:55:29 Re: Logging improvements and rehashing
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-09-05 21:40:37 Re: FK type mismatches?