From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pagination - 1 or 2 queries? |
Date: | 2003-09-05 21:03:05 |
Message-ID: | 200309052103.h85L35Z18434@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
CSN wrote:
>
> Behind the scenes, is there much performance
> difference between:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM table_with_millions_of_rows
> ORDER BY col1;
>
> and:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM table_with_millions_of_rows
> ORDER BY col1
> LIMIT 100
> OFFSET 100000;
Yes, the optimizer knows it doesn't have to execute the entire query, so
the later can be faster, but that doesn't return the COUNT(*), as
requested.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Lapidus | 2003-09-05 21:09:51 | aggregate function |
Previous Message | CSN | 2003-09-05 20:56:35 | Re: Pagination - 1 or 2 queries? |