Re: 64-bit pgsql

From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit pgsql
Date: 2003-09-05 18:31:36
Message-ID: 20030905183136.GP42098@nexus.ninth-circle.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-On [20030905 19:12], Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>It should not; there is something wrong here, not merely a documentation
>problem. I am wondering whether your 7.4 build fails to select a TAS()
>implementation --- if so, it would fall back to implementing spinlocks
>as semaphores, which would translate to a huge increase in the number of
>semaphores requested, which would likely result in this symptom. Can
>you strace the postmaster launch and see how many semget()s it does
>before dying?

I need to correct one statement Tom, the Athlon box had 3 semaphores in
use by another application. Which I killed after that. ipcs then
showed it was not using anything and initdb ran ok.

The Itanium box was also not using any semaphores and failed.

I also did the same on an 5.1-CURRENT Alpha box and it also worked.

So I guess the problem lies in the Itanium port. Or could I miss
something subtle here?

--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7 9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/~asmodai/diary/
Distance lends enhancement to the view...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-05 18:32:47 Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-05 18:28:42 C language context