| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, akavan(at)cox(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-05 17:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200309051712.h85HCMD19517@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What I'm wondering about is whether we are comparing the right number of
> >> bytes ... have both address structs been reported to have the same
> >> length? Maybe we need a min().
>
> > I disagree. If getsockname(), getpeername() or recvfrom() return
> > different address length's, it'd be more an indicator that the addresses
> > ARE different anyway.
>
> Hm, good point. But I still feel that we are jumping to a conclusion
> without understanding what's going on. I'd like to know *why* the
> addresses are different on Adam's machine, before we conclude that we
> mustn't try to check that they are the same.
Agreed. We should know exactly what is happening. My only point
earlier is that this has to be fixed for 7.4.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-05 17:18:50 | Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-05 17:08:15 | Re: 64-bit pgsql |