| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, akavan(at)cox(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-05 17:01:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20030905170137.GA17487@ping.be |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:35:11AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Redhat 7.1 says
>
> The file descriptor sockfd must refer to a socket. If the
> socket is of type SOCK_DGRAM then the serv_addr address is
> the address to which datagrams are sent by default, and
> the only address from which datagrams are received. If
>
> Looks like the test is obsolete. Any objections to remove it? Do people
> agree that it's a bugfix that can go into 7.4?
Reading SUS v2 and v3, both say:
If the initiating socket is not connection-mode, then connect()
sets the socket's peer address, but no connection is made. For
SOCK_DGRAM sockets, the peer address identifies where all datagrams
are sent on subsequent send() calls, and limits the remote sender
for subsequent recv() calls.
So it looks good to me.
I do wonder why nobody had a problem with this before however.
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-05 17:02:07 | Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-09-05 17:01:12 | Re: psql \h alter scrolls of screen |