From: | Chris Gamache <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: ODBC Connection Pooling (Windows 2000 MDAC 2.7 patched, pgodbc-7.02.00.05) |
Date: | 2003-09-05 16:13:48 |
Message-ID: | 20030905161348.25810.qmail@web13802.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Rats... In that case, the application creating the connection would have to
issue a command to the back-end before running any other SQL statements.
--- Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Chris Gamache wrote:
> >
> > That is my point exactly. That is why (windows?) connection
> > pooling breaks this model. It wouldn't be a problem if there
> > were a way to undefine currval() for all sequences...
> > It would be a command issued by the ODBC driver when the
> > connection is made (best), or by the connecting process as
> > its first order of business (do-able).
>
> How could the driver know if the connection is recycled ?
> SQL..Connect API function isn't called when the connection
> is recycled.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
> http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lord Corwin | 2003-09-05 19:21:59 | Question: ODBC connection across 2 disimilar NT Domains |
Previous Message | Brian J. Erickson | 2003-09-05 15:42:59 | Re: ODBC, SQLExecute and HY010 |