Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...
Date: 2003-09-04 23:34:52
Message-ID: 20030904233452.GT32016@perrin.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> yes it is/was ...I've just removed it from the list of stop words,
> but am not going to force a re-index of 250k URLs ;( So, any new
> index'ng will pull in index as a valid search word, and when the
> current URLs expire/re-index,they will get pulled in then also ...

Hrm... if I search for "correlation," I get some results. If I search
for "index," I don't get anything (expected), but if I search for
"index correlation," I get nothing. Why isn't it returning the same
results as when I searched for "correlation?"

Just a scratch that I finally had to scratch and ask about...

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-04 23:37:38 Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-04 23:26:07 Re: searching archives should be a weeeee bit faster ...