From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "3rd(dot)" <mnevara(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: YOUR SITES SEARCH FEATURE DOES NOT WORK! |
Date: | 2003-09-04 15:35:06 |
Message-ID: | 20030904123452.T803@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
go for it, point it at archives.postgresql.org though, since that is the
major part of the search engine
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > okay, first off ... what URL? I've been working on, and testing, archives
> > all week, and altho getting things down below a 2min search appears to be
> > near impossible (anyone know something *better* then mnogosearch that will
> > handle >250k URLs and growing ... ? we tried ht/Dig before, and the
> > resources it suck'd were outrageous) ...
>
> Hi Marc, I use htdig at work to index a rather large web site and it
> doesn't use resources all that bad. My htdig db directory is only 250
> megs and it screams. Are you sure it was that bad?
>
> Would it be ok if I pointed a test instance of htdig at postgresql.org at
> night and indexed it to get an idea of how much space it'll take to index
> it? I'm a huge fan of htdig/ warts and all, so I'd kinda like to see if
> it can be made to work.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mary Edie Meredith | 2003-09-04 15:35:27 | Seeking information about backup/recovery |
Previous Message | Diko Sastroprawiro | 2003-09-04 15:33:15 | unsubscribe |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | psql-mail | 2003-09-04 15:43:53 | Re: postmaster crashing |
Previous Message | psql-mail | 2003-09-04 15:31:01 | Re: postmaster crashing |