From: | Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: thread safety |
Date: | 2003-09-02 03:46:24 |
Message-ID: | 200309021346.24151.philip@utiba.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:06 am, Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> May be I'm wrong but I'd like know why thread safety was so
> necessary.
It bugged Lee enough that he went and wrote a patch for it. It bugged me
enough that I couldn't use it on our choice of platform (older Linux) that I
did some little fixes for that. I worked on what I needed.
If you need a justification for ECPG threading support: people porting from
Sybase/Informix/Oracle would probably expect ECPG to support threads, and
will get a nasty surprise when their ported application abruptly dies. I
expected it to "just work" and was unpleasantly surprised when it didn't.
Best Regards, Philip Yarra.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug Quale | 2003-09-02 04:07:28 | Re: About GPL and proprietary software |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-02 03:00:18 | Re: thread safety |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-02 03:56:22 | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-02 03:46:17 | Re: PG7.5 |