From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication |
Date: | 2003-09-02 11:34:17 |
Message-ID: | 20030902113417.GJ27043@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:33:33PM -0700, Ian Huynh wrote:
> There are certain cases where multi-master rep are very
> implementable such as where the datasets being rep are fairly
> disjointed but need to be replicated for completeness in terms of
> reporting. But you are absolutely 110% correct. Multimaster synchro
> is a nightmare.
If you had two completely separate databases, you could merge them
using erserver.
If you had some nifty tricks with unique indexes, &c., you could also
use erserver to merge them. Or at least, I think you could. Imagine
making all your unique indexes on two columns: say, the row id (just
a type serial) plus a server id (which was static for everything in
that database),
There are plenty of practical problems with such a scheme, and it
seems to me a little fragile, but it'd work.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Somasekhar Bangalore | 2003-09-02 12:08:52 | Re: postgresql and replication |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-09-02 11:24:03 | Re: eRserver |