Re: thread safety

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mendola Gaetano <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: thread safety
Date: 2003-09-02 02:59:17
Message-ID: 200309020259.h822xHt12488@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> I seen on this list a lot of energy ( also little flames involving SCO
> & Co. ) spent on thread safety;
> was really necessary spent so much energy in this direction?
> I was at Fosdem in Bruxelles ( I spoke there about the use
> of postgres in my project ) and I seen al people there
> was really exicited about the anticipation of Bruce Momjian
> about the PITR in 7.4 but how we know there was no time for it
>
> May be I'm wrong but I'd like know why thread safety was so
> necessary.

The thing that slows me down the most --- trips like FOSDEM. I am doing
one every month or every other month. That takes 1/4 of each month.
The threading discussion took 1/1000 of a month, but I do several
hundred of those, so it fills up a month quickly.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 03:00:18 Re: thread safety
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-01 19:18:28 Re: thread safety

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 03:00:18 Re: thread safety
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 02:53:36 Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)