From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | "Luis H(dot)" <pgsql-novice(at)geekhouse(dot)no-ip(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ORDER BY question |
Date: | 2003-09-01 19:09:54 |
Message-ID: | 20030901190954.GB1782@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:57:04 -0400,
"Luis H." <pgsql-novice(at)geekhouse(dot)no-ip(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info! Group by should do the trick.
>
> Why does replying to an unrelated message create an issue, btw? I changed
> the subject, headers and contents of the e-mail. Or at least I thought I
> did!
Because message threading isn't tracked by subject. There are other
headers that indicate a message is a reply and you didn't change the one
your mail client uses. Doing this hides your message in a thread with
a different topic.
> Also, why do people reply to both the message sender and the mailing list?
> Doesn't it just arrive duplicated in the sender's mailbox.
How do we know you are subscribed to the list?
If you don't want to be copied personally, setting the mail-followup-to
header will do this for many clients.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-09-01 19:15:44 | Re: starting up database server + user postgres |
Previous Message | Williams, Travis L, NEO | 2003-09-01 17:22:16 | Re: ORDER BY question |