Re: delivering database stand-alone

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joost Kremers <joostkremers(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: delivering database stand-alone
Date: 2003-09-01 16:52:02
Message-ID: 200309011652.h81Gq2T16539@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joost Kremers wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am planning to build a database (a dictionary in fact) that i will
> eventually want to distribute on a cd (or downloadable iso). what i would
> like to know is if this is technically possible with postgresql. and how
> exactly would it be done? would i have to make postgresql run off the cd,
> or should it first be installed to the hard disk? (the latter would be
> problematic on linux, given the many different distros and their different
> package management systems...) how would i deal with systems that already
> have a postgreql server or (more difficult perhaps) a different database
> server running?
>
> or should i not make use of postgresql (or any database server) at all for
> the cd? after all, the data in the database is static, users will not have
> to modify it, just look it up.
>
> thanks for any comments and suggestions.

PostgreSQL will not run on read-only medium easily. If you vacuum full all
the tables, that will prevent table writes, but we write to pg_clog even
for select.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-01 16:59:53 Re: More on 7.4b2 vs 7.3.4 performance
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-09-01 16:49:25 Re: French translation