Re: The ..... worm

From: expect <expect(at)ihubbell(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The ..... worm
Date: 2003-08-27 22:49:26
Message-ID: 20030827154926.0c0fc282.expect@ihubbell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:18:19 -0700
Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> wrote:

I don't have it, but I did get a spam from gearond(at)oit(dot)edu or was that
real?

Why does this list even use real addresses? Why not have From and To the same?
i.e. pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org

Is it a social issue or technical? I'd be surprised if it was the latter.

> <OT about the worm>
> Jeessh, a lot of people have my email address.
>
> I have received about 500 copies of the worm in the last 24 hours. My
> mail spool at work was sooooo full I couldn't get out or relay or
> anything. The wierd part is that it's my work address, and I'm
> subscribed to almost all my lists through the address above or my
> previous home address. YEARS ago I was using the work address for lists,
> but not for a LOOOOOOOOOOOONG time.
> </OT about the worm>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-08-27 22:55:36 Let's see if this helps ... more anti-virus/anti-spam ...
Previous Message Jeffrey Melloy 2003-08-27 22:21:03 Re: pgplsql - Oracle nvl