Re: NOTICE vs WARNING

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Date: 2003-08-27 12:46:49
Message-ID: 20030827124649.GD25066@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:21:25 +0800,
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
> I think that WARNING should be used for ALL things that have been
> deprecated. eg. implicit FROM, the opaque business, and definitely
> unsupported and ignored synacies.

Implicit froms aren't depreciated yet. For deletes there isn't any alternative
syntax yet. There was some discussion about possible syntaxes, but nothing
was done in this regard for 7.4.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-08-27 12:51:53 Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-08-27 11:40:07 Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load