| From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql for Solaris on Sparc |
| Date: | 2003-08-22 13:28:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200308221858.31590.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 22 August 2003 18:45, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > point of view. If you are running it on low end sun machine, sparc
> > linux+postgresql might prove a better combination.
>
> Why do you say performance is no good? I haven't had the occasion to
> compare on similar hardware. Did you?
>
> Besides that, I don't usually select Sun/Solaris for raw performance alone,
> in most server applications, stability and availability are much more
> important and this is where Solaris shines. And if I need something
> *really* fast, I always would try to go with Alpha.
I specifically said low end machine. I have not seen a sparc machine running a
SCSI disk. i.e my experience with solaris is limited. But I have seen two
machines in a migration project here from solaris+oracle to AIX+DB2. I know
there are too many variables here but AIX+DB2 combo vastly outperforms
solaris+oracle AFAIK. In particular a report took half the time on AIX than
that of oracle for almost same combo, the developer tells me..
Shridhar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | javier garcia - CEBAS | 2003-08-22 13:56:33 | pgAdminII Error |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-22 13:16:06 | Re: Postgresql for Solaris on Sparc |