Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hornyak Laszlo" <kocka(at)tigrasoft(dot)hu>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"
Date: 2003-08-22 08:29:32
Message-ID: 200308220929.32459.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Friday 22 August 2003 07:40, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Can someone explain me why is it usefull if the table created in
> > transaction disapears on rollback?
>
> Because then you can write big scripts like we do at work to install a new
> feature in the live database. Such a script might create two new tables,
> add columns to existing tables, drop and recreate some foreign keys, etc.
> What you do is to test it you go 'begin;' and then execute the script. If
> it all worked, commit, else rollback and fix the script. Repeat until you
> get it right.

Exactly - I'm currently finalising a schema in conjunction with a client who's
working with some telecoms control equipment. Being able to modify tables and
copy-forward the data inside a transaction is very useful.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:29:57 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:02:17 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete 'Why Postgres

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:29:57 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:02:17 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete 'Why Postgres

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:29:57 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-22 08:02:17 Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete 'Why Postgres