| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-21 20:20:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20030821202003.GD10003@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:05:28PM -0400, Edmund Dengler wrote:
> Well, if they are locked waiting on vacuum, then vacuum should upgrade
> it's priority to the highest waiting process (priority inheritance).
> This way, vacuum will be running at a priority level equivalent to who is
> waiting on it.
Right, but all that intelligence is something that isn't in there
now. And anyway, the real issue is I/O, not processor.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 20:22:37 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-08-21 20:19:57 | Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 20:22:37 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-08-21 20:19:57 | Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |