From: | expect <expect(at)ihubbell(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.4b1 vs 7.3.4 performance |
Date: | 2003-08-20 16:02:29 |
Message-ID: | 20030820090229.5513afe5.expect@ihubbell.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:47:38 -0400
"P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com> wrote:
> Ran sets of 150 pgbench runs, with clients (1, 2, 4, 8, 16) and
> transactions (5 each at 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000),
> then parsed and plotted with gnuplot. Breaks between number
> of clients are at run index 31, 61, 91, etc. A vacuum
> full was performed at each change of number of clients.
> Graph attached.
>
> Machine was a quad xeon, two separate database spaces
> on a 3 disk software RAID-0 array. Config file parameters
> (buffers, sort mem, logging, etc) were the same.
What were the config settings?
>
> 7.4b1 is significantly faster (i.e., the higher curve)
> over this range of clients and transactions.
>
> Will rerun with a vacuum between each number clients/transactions
> combination.
> --
> P. J. "Josh" Rovero Sonalysts, Inc.
> Email: rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com www.sonalysts.com 215 Parkway North
> Work: (860)326-3671 or 442-4355 Waterford CT 06385
> ***********************************************************************
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-08-20 16:11:38 | Re: Buglist |
Previous Message | expect | 2003-08-20 16:01:24 | Re: 7.4b1 vs 7.3.4 performance |