From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Buglist |
Date: | 2003-08-19 13:45:31 |
Message-ID: | 200308191915.31035.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 18:59, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> > My dealings with MySQL are for the 3.xx version but I semi-followed a
> > thread on this several months ago so feel fully qualified to to throw in
> > my views. :-) My take on others research was that MySQL transaction
> > model is a bubble gum and bailing wire add on not an integral part of
> > MySQL. It _was_ tacked onto the top of the database so if either it or
> > MySQL failed you were likely to loose data.
>
> But this goes for 3.x have you tried 4.x and there InnoDB tables ?
Well, if you have some time and hardware to play around, I am sure we can
easily test them side by side.
Interested? This could take couple of weeks taking things to real world
workloads but could provide some insight to community.
If you have mysql 4.x and postgresql 7.4beta installed, you can easily setup
these things..
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Siebert | 2003-08-19 13:46:45 | Re: Buglist |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-19 13:42:31 | Re: Buglist |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Siebert | 2003-08-19 13:46:45 | Re: Buglist |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-19 13:42:31 | Re: Buglist |