Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer
Date: 2003-08-17 05:09:13
Message-ID: 200308170509.h7H59Dq13652@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Oh, OK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's a date + integer operator, but no integer + date operator.
> >> Yawn...
>
> > Uh, "Yawn" means we don't need to fix it, or "oh, here's another one"?
>
> It means "I can't get excited about it." The docs don't claim that we
> have such an operator (do they?) and I see no clear advantage to adding
> one.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-17 05:22:06 Re: Reading from a read-only BLOB is allowed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-17 04:57:01 Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer