From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final |
Date: | 2003-08-13 16:10:38 |
Message-ID: | 200308130910.38343.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil,
> [If my comments below have already been raised, sorry -- I've been away,
> and missed the earlier drafts of the release.]
Howdy! How was the internship?
> I don't think the main intent of the new wire protocol is to "increase the
> speed of data transfers" -- does it actually make a significant
> improvement? (I'm not sure, having been away for the summer).
Somebody else inserted this; I'll let them defend it.
> > HIGH AVAILABILITY: Expansion of PostgreSQL's Free Space Map disk
> > management feature to support continuous index maintenence and the Auto
> > Vacuum Daemon are the last "puzzle pieces" in providing 99.999% uptime
> > for PostgreSQL databases.
>
> I certainly wouldn't call the autovacuum stuff the "last piece" in HA for
> PostgreSQL, and ISTM you just picked 5 nines right out of thin air.
Hmmm .... I see what you mean. I was trying to cut length by not having pgavd
as a seperate sentence. And yes, the 99.999 stuff is made up, although
completely possible now ...
If you have a suggestion for re-wording that paragraph around more solid
information, I'd like to see it. We want to get the point across that
vacuuming indexes + pgavd = no shutting the database down or lokcing tables
except for version upgrades, ever. And it has to be translated into
marketing-hypespeak.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-08-13 16:39:02 | Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-08-13 15:59:55 | Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final |