Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-12 20:40:22
Message-ID: 20030812204022.GJ13448@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:31:19PM -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
> impractical. has any consideration been given to providing a way to manage
> such a deployment?

Plenty. No-one's completed an implementation yet.

> or is it the judgement of the hackers community that a monsterous raid-10
> array offers comparable performance?

It's tough to say, but I _can_ tell you that, so far in my tests,
I've never been able to prove an advantage in separating even the WAL
on a Sun A5200. That's not a result yet, of course, just a bit of
gossip.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-08-12 20:40:40 Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Richard Welty 2003-08-12 20:31:19 Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning