From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning |
Date: | 2003-08-12 20:40:22 |
Message-ID: | 20030812204022.GJ13448@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:31:19PM -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
> impractical. has any consideration been given to providing a way to manage
> such a deployment?
Plenty. No-one's completed an implementation yet.
> or is it the judgement of the hackers community that a monsterous raid-10
> array offers comparable performance?
It's tough to say, but I _can_ tell you that, so far in my tests,
I've never been able to prove an advantage in separating even the WAL
on a Sun A5200. That's not a result yet, of course, just a bit of
gossip.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-08-12 20:40:40 | Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning |
Previous Message | Richard Welty | 2003-08-12 20:31:19 | Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning |