From: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Analyze makes queries slow... |
Date: | 2003-08-11 16:47:36 |
Message-ID: | 20030811184736.7e191a86.svb@ucs.co.za |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Tom,
Thanks for responding.
I got as much info as I could :
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:43:45 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
=> Could we see the results of "EXPLAIN ANALYZE", rather than just EXPLAIN,
=> for the un-analyzed case?
Attached the output of this.
=> Also, what do you see in pg_stats (after analyzing) for each of the
=> tables used in the query?
I attached a file in csv format of pg_stats after analyzing.
(With the columns selected on the top line)
It looks like cached values for (quite a lot of?) the table columns.
I would assume it stores the most commonly selected
values for every column with an index. Don't know if I'm correct.
=> And what PG version is this, exactly?
PostgreSQL 7.3.1
Kind regards
Stefan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
explain_analyze.txt | text/plain | 4.1 KB |
pg_stats.csv | text/comma-separated-values | 11.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2003-08-11 17:07:40 | Re: Windows on SuSE? 7.4 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-11 15:54:39 | Re: Windows on SuSE? 7.4 |