Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-11 15:24:14
Message-ID: 20030811152414.GF9086@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 08:47:07AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> This isn't saying to not use jounraling, but I would definitely test it
> under load first to make sure it's not gonna lose data or get corrupted.

Well, yeah. But given the Linux propensity for introducing major
features in "minor" releases (and thereby introducing all the
attendant bugs), I'd think twice about using _any_ Linux feature
until it's been through a major version (e.g. things introduced in
2.4.x won't really be stable until 2.6.x) -- and even there one is
taking a risk[1].

A

My laptop's PCMCIA network card recently stopped working during a
"minor" version upgrade, even though it's almost 6 years old.
Someone decided that "cleaning up" the code required complete
redesign, and so all the bugs that had been shaken out during the 2.2
series will now be reimplemented in a new and interesting way. Sigh.

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-11 15:43:45 Re: Analyze makes queries slow...
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-08-11 14:47:07 Re: Perfomance Tuning