From: | Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sub-sel/group problem |
Date: | 2003-08-11 10:38:43 |
Message-ID: | 200308111138.43196.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Monday 11 August 2003 11:24 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I don;t know if it's cos it's Monday or what, but I can't see what's wrong
> here.
>
> I've got two tables, turns which holds a turn number, a task, and where
> appropriate a link to a loco. The select below works but only shows those
> tasks where a loco is involved.:
>
[snip]
Having re-read my email and had another go, I've opted for the sub-select
approach, and come up with:
select rtid, concat(task) from
(select rtid,
case when r.rlid > 0 then
r.rcid::text || ' on ' || l.lnumber::text
else
r.rcid::text
end as task
from rides r
left outer join loco_dets l on r.rlid = l.lid) r
group by rtid
order by rtid
;
Can anyone see any problems with this, or come up with a better approach?
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Anderson Vianet SAO | 2003-08-11 11:36:28 | update system table? |
Previous Message | Christoph Haller | 2003-08-11 10:38:31 | Re: sub-sel/group problem |