Re: getting confused parsing ACLITEMS...

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting confused parsing ACLITEMS...
Date: 2003-08-10 03:26:57
Message-ID: 20030810112610.Y98663-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Seriously, I think there's a good case for banning a few characters in
> at least some names - like []<>'"~#*|\ , say

Why? They're allowed in all other identifiers. And what if someone
already has a database full of usernames with those chars? They wouldn't
be able to load their dump properly...

Chris

> andrew
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Is it useful to allow these special chars at all? Seems this creates a
> >>lot of work, and most admins will probably stick to "normal" user names
> >>anyway.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Well, the reason it's been left unfixed for so long is exactly that it
> >didn't seem pressing. But if Chris wants to do the work, I won't stand
> >in his way ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-10 03:43:32 Re: getting confused parsing ACLITEMS...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-08-10 03:24:39 Re: getting confused parsing ACLITEMS...