From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: regression test failure |
Date: | 2003-08-07 19:03:23 |
Message-ID: | 200308071903.h77J3N013423@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Strange. I know we check for bison >= 1.875, and you have that, and so
do I, but I don't see those regression failures. Is it possible you
have old bison output files from an older bison release?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> When I run the regression tests against current sources, I get
> failures because bison-generated error messages use "parse
> error", not "syntax error". I vaguely recall running into
> this issue before I left for the summer -- did we resolve
> it?
>
> [neil(at)arch neil]$ uname -a
> FreeBSD arch.wavefire.com 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #9: Fri Jul 25 12:10:58 PDT 2003 root(at)arch(dot)wavefire(dot)com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION-5.0-SMP i386
> [neil(at)arch neil]$ bison --version
> bison (GNU Bison) 1.875
> [neil(at)arch neil]$ flex --version
> flex version 2.5.4
>
> regression.diffs is attached.
>
> -Neil
>
> P.S. Someone should go ahead and re-generate INSTALL from
> the latest SGML: INSTALL still claims that we need bison
> 1.50 or greater.
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-07 20:09:33 | Re: regression test failure |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-08-07 18:21:45 | regression test failure |