| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial |
| Date: | 2003-08-06 13:00:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20030806095946.C11591@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> scott.marlowe writes:
>
> > Do we need official permission to call the language plPHP by the way?
>
> Can someone explain to me why language handler modules for PostgreSQL are
> always called "PL/Language"? Consider if someone wrote a language binding
> for Scheme, then calling that "procedural language Scheme" sounds like an
> insult to me.
vs calling them ... what? :)
For lack of any other suggestion, they are always called PL/Language?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | psql-mail | 2003-08-06 13:05:06 | Tsearch2 or openFTS ? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-06 12:58:54 | Re: Error message: Ralation X does not have attribute Y |