| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logging stuff |
| Date: | 2003-08-05 22:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200308052250.h75Mo6q27550@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ... And of course, we already have pid and timestamp, so once
> > we are done, we will have seven possible data items on each line, and
> > with booleans there will be no control over their order on the line.
>
> Which is exactly the way I want it ;-). I can't see any use that would
> justify the amount of extra logic needed to allow user-specified
> ordering of the entries. This feature discussion seems to be
> degenerating into a gild-the-lily contest ...
Depends if someone needs a lilly, though I have not heard anyone say
they do. ;-)
Adding several new variables is fine, but what do we call the hostname
option if we already have log_hostname?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-08-05 22:53:47 | Re: logging stuff |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-08-05 22:47:56 | Re: Adjustment of spinlock sleep delays |