Re: Release changes

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)home(dot)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release changes
Date: 2003-08-05 22:27:48
Message-ID: 20030805222748.GA1833@home.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:47:36AM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> AFAICS the current implementation still doesn't have a way to access the
> affected rowset, so it'a pretty much like a SELECT without a WHERE.

Yeah, unfortunately I didn't get a chance to implement this functionality
during the 7.4 cycle (and it apparently wasn't important enough for
anyone else to do it while I've been away). I'll probably get around
to doing it some time before the 7.5 release.

The current STATEMENT trigger code is still useful, IMHO -- I think
your suggestion that we should remove any mention of this feature
from the docs is certainly going too far. Should I submit a patch
for the documentation to include a note about what functionality
hasn't been implemented yet?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Tenny 2003-08-05 22:35:32 PostgreSQL JDBC driver Connection.setTransactionIsolation(Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE) failures
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-08-05 22:22:23 Re: TODO: trigger features